Re: Replication to more than one replica?

From: Bron Gondwana (no email)
Date: Fri Aug 10 2007 - 22:28:42 EDT

  • Next message: Rob Mueller: "Re: Replication to more than one replica?"

    On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 01:24:29PM -0400, Wesley Craig wrote:
    > With such a small number of users, you might be all set. Keep in
    > mind that -u only gets users, not shared mailboxes not associated
    > with any user. In UMich's system, we just run tape backups on the
    > replica, no need for a second replica. I've done cost comparisons
    > between having two replicas or having the first replica write to tape
    > (answer: depends).

    Yeah - we run a clever little thing that can stat index files, parse
    them for a list of UUIDs it hasn't seen yet (relies on a reliable
    UUID infrastructure, of course) and just fetch the new messages based
    on that. It's very nice and efficent on IO (even more so than our
    previous thing that was based on opendir() and readdir() of the message
    files without statting and just getting new names, plus we keep the
    index files around for that bit more meta data)

    Bron.

    ----
    Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
    Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
    List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
    

  • Next message: Rob Mueller: "Re: Replication to more than one replica?"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD