Cyrus & ZFS performance

From: Vincent Fox (no email)
Date: Tue Jul 03 2007 - 19:05:53 EDT

  • Next message: Dale Ghent: "Re: Cyrus & ZFS performance"

    I just thought to report back to the list, that ZFS is working out well.

    I asked a while ago about other's opinions, and got all thumbs up.

    We deployed a setup with Sun T2000 running Solaris 10u3 (11/06)
    and a pair of Sun 3510FC arrays mirroring in a hybrid HA RAID
    5+1+0 setup that I can describe further if anyone cares.

    We currently have 27,323 accounts on it, and it is performing
    very well, with atime=off and compression=on. We have only
    recently migrated a lot of this existing userbase over using
    an imapsync method, so we are not as yet seeing so much of
    space/performance benefits of single instance store.

    The snapshot feature lets us keep 14 days worth in the pool and
    beyond that we'd go to backups. Actually doing NetBackup of
    a Cyrus partition is incredibly slow however, so we are looking
    at replication to another server for disaster recovery. Then
    perhaps we can dispense with tapes entirely.

    ----
    Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
    Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
    List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
    

  • Next message: Dale Ghent: "Re: Cyrus & ZFS performance"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD