Re: Replication speeds?

From: Wesley Craig (no email)
Date: Wed May 09 2007 - 14:01:39 EDT

  • Next message: Janne Peltonen: "Re: defaultbc vs. default.bc"

    Obviously looking at more iostat information would give a better
    idea, but I'd estimate that you are NOT I/O bound. Sorry I can't
    give you absolute numbers from UM, but I can share a patch that we
    wrote that we believe has increase sync throughput substantially, as
    evidenced by the lack of a sync backlog which we were getting before
    we added the patch.

    The patch itself is pretty simple. As with most TCP-based request-
    response protocols, the Cyrus sync protocol suffers from artificial
    "Nagle" delays. See:

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nagle's_algorithm

    for what's good about Nagle's algorithm. The patch disables Nagle
    delays in both sync_client and sync_server.

    :wes


    On 09 May 2007, at 11:05, Nik Conwell wrote:
    > What sort of rates are you all getting for replication?
    >
    > At 2.3.7 for a manual sync_client for a user, I'm seeing ~35MB/
    > minute across a 100M net to a linux SW RAID 1 pair of U320 disks.
    >
    > Is this speed typical or abysmal?
    >
    > Disks appear to be holding me back:
    >
    > Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/s rkB/s
    > wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util
    > dm-0 0.00 0.00 0.00 429.96 0.00 3439.65 0.00
    > 1719.83 8.00 7.24 16.75 1.86 80.01
    >
    > Production (40,000+ users) would probably be FC and gigE...


    ----
    Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
    Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
    List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
    


  • Next message: Janne Peltonen: "Re: defaultbc vs. default.bc"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD