- Previous message: Dana Canfield: "Cyrus Quota vs. du"
- In reply to: Dana Canfield: "Cyrus Quota vs. du"
- Next in thread: Andrew Morgan: "Re: Cyrus Quota vs. du"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
|
|
|
From: Peter A. Friend (no email)
Date: Wed May 02 2007 - 12:14:12 EDT
On May 2, 2007, at 8:51 AM, Dana Canfield wrote:
> We've been slowly phasing in mail quotas and I've discovered that
> the quota usage reported by cyrus doesn't match a du for that same
> user. In fact, I can't find any user where the reports *do*
> match. Is this a sign of quota corruption, or am I overlooking
> something about how the quotas work?
>
> Here are some examples to show what I'm checking:
>
> [root at balrog ~]# du -s /var/spool/imap/e/user/efreem
> 1068664 /var/spool/imap/e/user/efreem
> [root at balrog ~]# du -s /var/spool/imap/a/user/austin
> 1178924 /var/spool/imap/a/user/austin
>
> [root at balrog efreem]# cyradm --user cyrus localhost
> localhost.localdomain> lq user.efreem
> STORAGE 904193/2000000 (45.20965%)
> localhost.localdomain> lq user.austin
> STORAGE 703056/1000000 (70.3056%)
The du utility reports usage in terms of blocks, not bytes. This is a
major drawback of maildir type systems, they can have nasty partial
block overheads.
Peter
---- Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
|
|
|