Re: FastMail.FM patchset - new patches

From: David Carter (no email)
Date: Thu Mar 15 2007 - 09:09:04 EDT

  • Next message: Rob Mueller: "Re: FastMail.FM patchset - new patches"

    On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Rob Mueller wrote:

    > May not be true, but:
    >
    >> Is it safe? - we calulated that with one billion messages you have a one
    >> in 1 billion chance of a birthday collision (two random messages with
    >> the same UUID).
    >
    > Is true.

    Fair enough.

    With hindsight I should probably have defined message UUIDs to be the full
    MD5 hash: 128 bits isn't that much worse than 96 bits per message. What is
    the CPU overhead like for calculating MD5 sums for everything on the fly?

    UUIDs started out life as Mailbox UniqueID (64 bits) plus Message UID (32
    bits), hence the size and rather unfortunate name. The hash algorithmn
    used to generate mailbox uniqueIDs is a bit basic, which is why I switched
    to generating them on the fly from master.

    -- 
    David Carter                             Email: 
    University Computing Service,            Phone: (01223) 334502
    New Museums Site, Pembroke Street,       Fax:   (01223) 334679
    Cambridge UK. CB2 3QH.
    ----
    Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
    Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
    List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
    

  • Next message: Rob Mueller: "Re: FastMail.FM patchset - new patches"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD