Re: load balancing at fastmail.fm

From: urgrue (no email)
Date: Mon Feb 12 2007 - 16:55:13 EST

  • Next message: David Lang: "Re: load balancing at fastmail.fm"

    > If it's using block level replication, how does it offer instant
    > recovery on filesystem corruption? Does it track every block written
    > to disk, and can thus roll back to effectively what was on disk at a
    > particular instant in time, so you then just remount the filesystem
    > and the replay of the journal should restore to a good state?
    Yes. I may be wrong but to my understanding at least NetApp has this
    capability.

    >
    > With file based replication, about your only way of failure is the
    > replication software going crazy blowing both sides away somehow,
    > which given that the protocol is strictly designed to be one way,
    > seems extremely unlikely that anything will happen to the master side.
    I agree of course about avoiding SPOFs, but I do like a multi-tiered
    approach, I mean multiple lines of defense. I use SAN for its speed,
    reliability, and ease of administration, but naturally I replicate
    everything on the SAN and have "true" backups as well.

    ----
    Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
    Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
    List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
    

  • Next message: David Lang: "Re: load balancing at fastmail.fm"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD