Re: NFSv4, anyone?

From: Rudy Gevaert (no email)
Date: Fri Dec 01 2006 - 17:45:43 EST

  • Next message: Adam Kramer: "Re: NFSv4, anyone?"

    Adam Kramer wrote:
    > Just another datapoint,
    >
    > Cyrus seems to work fine with a 2.4 kernel via NFSv3 to a netapp filer
    > when mounted with -o nolock. It doesn't use lockd, but it still uses
    > local locking. imaptest has no problems (except for "STORE failed: NO
    > Too many user flags in mailbox" which is just because cyrus has a
    > limit on how many different flags can exist in a mailbox.) I undefined
    > RAND_KEYWORDS and recompiled imaptest and it didn't report any errors
    > in about 20 minutes of running.
    >
    > Obviously with '-o nolock' you won't be able to have two servers
    > accessing the same mail store, but it could be used for quick failover
    > from one machine to another while still having the benefits of a
    > netapp like snapmirroring and .snapshot directories.

    How do you get consistant snapshots? Without stopping cyrus... Or don't
    you care about that?

    -- 
    -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
    Rudy Gevaert                    tel:+32 9 264 4734
    Directie ICT, afd. Infrastructuur  Direction ICT, Infrastructure dept.
    Groep Systemen                     Systems group
    Universiteit Gent                  Ghent University
    Krijgslaan 281, gebouw S9, 9000 Gent, Belgie               www.UGent.be
    -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
    ----
    Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
    Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
    List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
    

  • Next message: Adam Kramer: "Re: NFSv4, anyone?"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD