Re: Replication is broken with modseq issue in 2.3.6

From: Bron Gondwana (no email)
Date: Thu Jul 06 2006 - 21:03:48 EDT

  • Next message: David S. Madole: "Re: Replication is broken with modseq issue in 2.3.6"

    On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 16:56:45 -0400, "Wesley Craig" <> said:
    > I was tracking a very similar issue with xfer between 2.2 and 2.3.6.
    > xfer'ing vanilla 2.2.12 mailboxes to 2.3.6 seems to work fine, and
    > xfer'ing a 2.3.6 mailbox to 2.2.12 also more or less works
    > (permissions are broken since 2.3.6 blindly uses rfc 4314 ACLs rather
    > than paying attention to whether the target backend supports only
    > legacy ACLs). However, xfer'ing this twice xfer'd mailbox back from
    > 2.2 to 2.3.6 results in the modseq 0 problem: 2.2.x retains the
    > larger index records, initialized to 0.
    >
    > Thanks for sharing your fixes, they will be invaluable to me.

    Fantastic - glad I could help. It's always nicer when changes don't
    break backwards compatibility.

    We don't use xfer - we do something disgusting with rsync instead
    because it's much faster and leaves the user's mailbox out of action
    for a lot shorter time.

    We also do the wrong thing with sieve scripts (a file called
    defaultbc rather than a symlink) which bit us with replication
    - but all our sieve scripts are built from the database, so
    they were easy to fix. We'll be changing to do the right thing
    because relying on undocumented behaviour is a stupid long-term
    strategy.

    Bron.

    -- 
      Bron Gondwana
      
    ----
    Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
    Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
    List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
    

  • Next message: David S. Madole: "Re: Replication is broken with modseq issue in 2.3.6"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD