Re: Replication is broken with modseq issue in 2.3.6

From: Wesley Craig (no email)
Date: Thu Jul 06 2006 - 20:11:47 EDT

  • Next message: Bron Gondwana: "Re: Replication is broken with modseq issue in 2.3.6"

    Looks like that changes the replication protocol incompatibly, so
    deployments need to update both replicas and primaries at the same time.

    :wes

    On 06 Jul 2006, at 17:17, David S. Madole wrote:
    > I submitted a patch that does actually replicate the modseq value,
    > although unfortunately my first effort was done a little too quickly
    > and I neglected conversion to/from network byte order as used in the
    > index files, meaning that the values are not replicated correctly on
    > x86 machines.
    >
    > Ken did fix my patch, however, and put it into CVS so I expect this
    > will be working in the next release. I also fixed my own patch with
    > the needed ntonl and ntohl etc and re-uploaded into Bugzilla for
    > anyone who wants it before then:
    >
    > https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=2859

    ----
    Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
    Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
    List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
    

  • Next message: Bron Gondwana: "Re: Replication is broken with modseq issue in 2.3.6"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD