From: Phil Pennock (no email)
Date: Wed Jul 05 2006 - 18:58:03 EDT
On 2006-07-05 at 15:43 -0600, Michael Loftis wrote:
> It would be nice to have more details about version of ReiserFS, what hash
> was being used, kernel version, hardware involved, and NFS or not
> (especially kernel NFSd)...
I've never tried NFS in a production environment at work, so this was my
private machine, as said. No NFS, since BerkeleyDB doesn't play well
with it. Very much a play configuration.
ReiserFS 3.6.19 on Gentoo/x86 Linux, 2.6.x kernels, with local SATA. FS
options would have been the defaults -- I never tinkered, since the I/O
level was so low that I never needed to. Kernel: I think it was the
current one, 2.6.17-gentoo-r7.
And no, there had been no power failures -- I have a UPS.
-- "Everything has three factors: politics, money, and the right way to do it. In that order." -- Gary Donahue ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
|
|
|