Re: Mailstore filesystem

From: Wil Cooley (no email)
Date: Wed Jul 05 2006 - 16:09:16 EDT

  • Next message: Michael Loftis: "Re: Mailstore filesystem"

    On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 17:47 +0200, Marten Lehmann wrote:
    > Hello
    >
    > > Really? Nice. But you would have to re-create the ext3 filesystem with
    > > this newer 2.6 kernel, right? Or would tune2fs do the job given the
    > > right options?
    >
    > I once enabled the index-option with tune2fs on an old ext3 filesystem
    > at 2.4 kernel which didn't give much performance boost. But partitions I
    > created on new 2.6 kernel systems worked well.

    You have to actually use 'e2fsck -D -f /dev/XXX' to re-hash the
    directories when you change this.

    For anyone curious, RHEL3's 2.4 kernel also supports indexed
    directories, which you can enable with:

      tune2fs -O dir_index /dev/XXX

    For a write-intensive filesystem, one might also want to increase the
    journal size; I believe the perceived hangs are caused by the journal
    needing to be flushed too often. Here's a message where Ted Ts'o
    mentions it:

    http://lopsa.org/pipermail/discuss/2006-February/000810.html

    Adding 'noatime' probably helps too.

    Of course, if you can move the Journal Block Device elsewhere, like a
    faster region of the disk(s) or another spindle that will likely help
    considerably too.

    Wil

    -- 
    Wil Cooley <>
    Naked Ape Consulting, Ltd
    
    


    ----
    Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
    Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
    List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
    


  • Next message: Michael Loftis: "Re: Mailstore filesystem"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD