Re: Mailstore filesystem

From: Wesley Craig (no email)
Date: Mon Jul 03 2006 - 12:02:00 EDT

  • Next message: Daniel Eckl: "Re: Mailstore filesystem"

    On 03 Jul 2006, at 11:35, Daniel Eckl wrote:
    > At this time I didn't change the scheduler. In fact, I actually
    > learned
    > about it a few days ago... So it was SuSE 9.3 default (might be
    > vanilla
    > default, don't know)

    I think "anticipatory" is the default IO scheduler for SuSE 9.3 (from
    Google).

    > What would you recommend for cyrus? (or for ext3 running cyrus)?
    > And are
    > there prefered scheduler for other fs, too, especially reiser and xfs?

    It would probably depend on your setup. Given the problem you
    describe, tho, I would think that "deadline" would improve your
    performance. The 2.6 kernel has many tunable parameters. If you're
    pushing a server at all near its limits, you probably need to become
    an expert in performance tuning. Or buy more hardware :)

    :wes

    ----
    Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
    Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
    List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
    

  • Next message: Daniel Eckl: "Re: Mailstore filesystem"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD