Re: More robust INDEXing

From: Kjetil Torgrim Homme (no email)
Date: Mon May 01 2006 - 08:51:08 EDT

  • Next message: Ken Murchison: "Re: idled vs poll"

    On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 16:26 -0400, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
    > Slightly OT: however, there are a few programs out there that offer a
    > richer indexing method (a la Google for your email).
    >
    > I wonder if there's a place for that somewhere in the Cyrus structure.
    > There's obvious utility in a richer search-and-find method.

    you don't seem to be familiar with squatter, which does full text search
    for Cyrus. I can search a gigabyte of mail in a couple of seconds (my
    e-mail client is Evolution, but I imagine Thunderbird will send off the
    IMAP body search command just as well.)

    squatter is far from perfect, though -- it runs periodically, ie. at
    night[1], and indexes everything afresh each time. this is a
    significant I/O load for an IMAP server, and it may not run to
    completion during the night on a large server. the index itself will
    also be almost the same size as the mailbox.

    [1] Cyrus will do brute force search for the messages not in the
    squatter index, so you won't miss messages in your search.

    squatter index can be enabled on a folder by folder basis by setting an
    annotation on the folder.

    -- 
    Kjetil T.
    ----
    Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
    Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
    List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
    

  • Next message: Ken Murchison: "Re: idled vs poll"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD