- Previous message: Ken Murchison: "Re: mupdate with starttls?"
- Maybe in reply to: Scott Russell: "cyrus-imapd 2.3.3-1"
- Next in thread: Mark: "Re: cyrus-imapd 2.3.3-1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
|
|
|
From: Ken Murchison (no email)
Date: Fri Mar 10 2006 - 19:05:34 EST
Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:
> Quoting Scott Russell <>:
>
>> Can anyone comment on how the cyrus-imapd 2.3.3-1 RPM is working for
>> them? I remember there were some stability problems in imapd after
>> 2.3.1-3 which was tracking CVS bug fixes and it was recommended to
>> back down to 2.3.1-2. I'm not sure what became of those reports or if
>> they have resurfaced again under 2.3.3-1.
>
>
> I had it installed on couple of testing boxes. It worked OK for
> "single-server" installation. However, cluster (Murder) type of
> installation was unusable. The mupdate process would just suck CPU and
> get stuck eventually. I've wrote about this problem on the list, and it
> seems at least one more person hit the same problem (see the thread with
> subject "cyrus murder, mupdate sucking up CPU"). I also opened bugzilla
> entry (bug# 2806). I had same problem with all 2.3.x that were released
> so far.
I've verified that a problem exists in mupdate due to some code changes
that I made in prot_select(). I haven't fixed it yet, but I'm working
on it (debugging threaded code sucks).
-- Kenneth Murchison Systems Programmer Project Cyrus Developer/Maintainer Carnegie Mellon University ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
|
|
|