- Previous message: David R Bosso: "Re: Cyrus Postfix Spamassassin"
- Maybe in reply to: Caleb Walker: "Cyrus Postfix Spamassassin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
|
|
|
From: Sven Mueller (no email)
Date: Mon Feb 06 2006 - 17:24:53 EST
David R Bosso wrote on 06/02/2006 21:56:
>
>>but unlike
>>amavisd-new (which uses spamc/spamd unless I'm mistaken), it uses
>>SpamAssassin's perl modules directly.
>
> You're mistaken there. Amavisd-new has the option to use the SA pearl
> libs, that's how we run it here. See:
>
> <http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/#features-performance>
Thanks very much for the correction, I wasn't aware of that feature.
I have to admit though (and that is true for both amavisd-new and
spampd) that using the perl modules directly doesn't add much
performance over using the spamc/spamd combination. Especially when you
also use networked tests (like DCC, razor, pyzor or DNSBLs).
Anyway, I still don't like amavisd-new's spam report headers. Unless
they also nowadays differ from what I saw about a year back when using
the spamc/spamd kind of running the spam tests with amavisd-new. A
matter of personal taste though.
cu,
sven
---- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
|
|
|