Re: Cyrus Postfix Spamassassin

From: Mike Cathey (no email)
Date: Fri Feb 03 2006 - 16:35:53 EST

  • Next message: (no name): "Re: SpamAssassin help not learning (Benjamin Adams)"

    On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 04:58 -0800, Caleb Walker wrote:
    > I am having a hard time finding the best way to combine these 3
    > products. Currently I have mail arrive through postfix, which sends to
    > procmail, which sends through spamassassin and then to the cyrus message
    > store. This process, going through procmail and spamassassin takes a
    > lot of time especially with high traffic mail servers. Doing it this
    > way I seem to lose the benefit of sieve as well. What is the best way
    > to approach this and make it work more efficiently and optionally get
    > the usage of sieve?

    I would humbly suggest that you consider using Amavisd-new.

    The flow looks like this on our system:

    postfix -> amavisd-new (sa/clamav) -> postfix -> postfix -> cyrus

    We're using local tcp sockets for postfix<->amavis. We use a unix
    socket for lmtp, but we'll probably be switching to TCP at some point.

    Cheers,

    Mike



    ----
    Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
    Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
    List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
    


  • Next message: (no name): "Re: SpamAssassin help not learning (Benjamin Adams)"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD