From: Etienne Goyer (no email)
Date: Wed Jun 01 2005 - 09:42:37 EDT
Marco Colombo wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 11:46 -0700, Jules Agee wrote:
>>Seconded.
>>info-cyrus is the only list I'm subscribed to that allows posting by
>>non-subscribers. Maybe it's not a coincidence that it's also the only
>>list that I get spam & viruses from on a regular basis.
>
> This makes no sense. As I said before, it takes a close-to-zero effort
> to forge headers. Subscribers-only or open, it's a matter of list
> _policy_. It may have a minimal effect of reducing spam, but that's not
> the point. If you want to stop spam, use a specific filter. Bypassing
> the subscribers-only check is trivial.
What you are saying is technically correct. But there is a caveat. I
am subscribed to about two dozens list (more ? I lost count), and the
only one I am getting spam from is info-cyrus. It's also the only one
that I aware permit posting by non-subscriber. So there is a
correllation, but are there a causation ? I do not know, it might be a
coincidence. But it's one heck of a coincidence.
Also, I do believe that list administrator have a responsability to take
measure against abuse of their list. Acting as amplificator for spammer
certainly constitute an abuse. I admin a few low-volume myself, and I
take spam very seriously. The only list where I permit posting by
non-subscribers is moderated. While my list do not have the volume or
notoriety of info-cyrus, I can't remember the last time a spam got
through one my list.
If forged sender address ever become a problem, I will run my lists
through SpamAssassin and moderate high-scoring mail by hand. Simple
matter of responsability to my users.
--- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
|
|
|