Re: spamassassin - sa-learn and public

From: Craig White (no email)
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 15:30:57 EST

  • Next message: Ezsra McDonald: "IMAP auths even without valid mailboxes."

    On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 10:37 -0800, Norman Zhang wrote:
    > Craig White wrote:
    > > Now that I have a functional bayes system for spamassassin...does it
    > > make sense to have a subfolder in the 'public' mailbox for people to
    > > drag their low scoring spam into so sa-learn can add it to the bayes db
    > > by cron based scripts?
    > >
    > > Is there a better way?
    > >
    > > If 'anyone' has lrs rights on public but lrsiwpcda rights on
    > > public.SPAM-learn would they be able to do this?
    >
    > I've googled the following thread earlier. Perhaps it is helpful.
    >
    > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=110885432500003&r=1&w=2

    ----
    it's interesting and I have done that in the past with uw-imap but I
    never had any shared folders in uw-imap.
    I can't see the logic of automatically taking people's inbox
    automatically as ham...
    - they may not have cleared their inbox of spam in which case, spam
    would accumulate as ham
    - they may not be checking their email at all and what ever is in their
    inbox would be whatever is there
    I can see the issue of a folder that they couldn't access prompting
    calls but if it's a public folder that they can post and delete from,
    that seems to solve their issues.
    I guess I'm no closer to the answer here
    Craig
    ---
    Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
    Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
    List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
    

  • Next message: Ezsra McDonald: "IMAP auths even without valid mailboxes."





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD