From: Ken Murchison (no email)
Date: Sat Sep 18 2004 - 08:20:42 EDT
David Carter wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
>> Actually what I was really asking, is are people looking for an
>> active-active config and an active-passive config?
> I'm not sure that IMAP is ameniable to active-active: the prevalence of
> UIDs in the protocol means that it would be very hard to resolve the
> inconsistencies that would occur if a pair of machines ever lost touch.
Right, I was assuming that active-passive is what we would probably get,
I was just taking the pulse of the community.
> I would be happy to be proved wrong: active-active is clearly better
> from a system administrator perspective :).
-- Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd. Software Engineer 21 Princeton Place 716-662-8973 x26 Orchard Park, NY 14127 --PGP Public Key-- http://www.oceana.com/~ken/ksm.pgp --- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html