Re: Funding Cyrus High Availability

From: Ken Murchison (no email)
Date: Sat Sep 18 2004 - 08:20:42 EDT

David Carter wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
>> Actually what I was really asking, is are people looking for an
>> active-active config and an active-passive config?
> I'm not sure that IMAP is ameniable to active-active: the prevalence of
> UIDs in the protocol means that it would be very hard to resolve the
> inconsistencies that would occur if a pair of machines ever lost touch.

Right, I was assuming that active-passive is what we would probably get,
I was just taking the pulse of the community.

> I would be happy to be proved wrong: active-active is clearly better
> from a system administrator perspective :).

Kenneth Murchison     Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Engineer     21 Princeton Place
716-662-8973 x26      Orchard Park, NY 14127
--PGP Public Key--
Cyrus Home Page:
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ:
List Archives/Info:

Hosted Email Solutions

Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs

Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD