From: David Carter (no email)
Date: Mon Sep 01 2003 - 04:14:52 EDT
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> Hmmm, the way you phrase that makes me believe that you don't normally
> expect ALL mailboxes to be indexed... I was sort of expecting that I
> should be indexing all mailboxes on the system.
That's what I do (squatter -s overnight).
It does take quite a long time to complete, and it eats CPU even on my
fast but typically rather bored Pentium 4 Xeons.
> Part of my reasoning for this was just to get rid of the annoying:
>
> SQUAT failed to open index file
>
> messages in the syslogs. :)
Log at info rather than debug level: that way you get much less noise. At
least until you decide to hack the code so that the LMTP daemon logs
deliver and redirect accounts plus vacation messages...
-- David Carter Email: University Computing Service, Phone: (01223) 334502 New Museums Site, Pembroke Street, Fax: (01223) 334679 Cambridge UK. CB2 3QH.
|
|
|