Re: Two huge problems with CMU (tag stable_2.2) sieve 2.0 of the current cvs source !

From: Franz Skale (no email)
Date: Wed Mar 05 2003 - 10:27:24 EST


The mail is delivered in the right mailbox.
I am using virtdomains too, with no problems.
In my opinion there's a problem with sieve, because the reply mail is
sent with the -f sendmail option but with an empty sender address.
Is there a hidden sieve switch in the imapd.conf, or is sendmail
responsible for the weird behaviour ?
Is there an elegant way to activate all sieve scripts on startup ?

Franz

On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 16:19, Christian Schulte wrote:
> Franz Skale wrote:
>
> >Things are running good with the cvs code of cyrus (branche 2.2) but
> >there are 2 probs i have with sieve.
> >Btw. i am using sendmail 8.12.8 with the lmtp unix socket delivering
> >option. (cyrusv2.mc)
> >
> >The cvs source from last week worked perfectly with the vacation
> >extension.
>
> I did a cvs update a few minutes ago and this is the first time I
> checked out the sieve-bytecode stuff. Some scripts do not behave as they
> did before! I cannot say why things differ now but somehow mail gets
> delivered to wrong folders say not the folders to which they were
> delivered before?!?! I am using virtdomains, unix-hierarchysep and
> altnamespace (the full program). Is there anything known for which the
> sieve-bytecode compiler does not produce correct bytecode ?
>
> --Christian--

-- 
------------------------
Franz Skale
Systems Engineer 
Cubit IT Solutions GmbH.
Albertgasse 43
A-1080 Wien
Tel.: ++43 1 718 98 80 - 0
Fax.: ++43 1 718 98 80 - 11
email: 







Hosted Email Solutions

Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD