From: Jason Fesler (no email)
Date: Tue Feb 04 2003 - 11:33:40 EST
> However, had message IDs been the RFC822 message ID, then it would have
> been possible to receive new mail on each node. Since the IDs would not
> collide, that would be OK. If you did get the same ID delivered to both
> somehow, it should be the same mail. If not, it violates the RFC, so
> then you decide to replace one of them or change one of them and move on.
Perhaps the same mail, but with different Received: headers, and possibly
with mailing list software headers added. IMO, "Message-Id:" is not
strong enough of a UIDL, *especially* for list owners.
|
|
|