From: Jeremy Rumpf (no email)
Date: Fri Jan 10 2003 - 10:32:35 EST
> This whole idea sounds great, especially as I'd expect a lot of the
> authentication load to come from a small number of users with their
> clients set to check mail every few minutes.
>
> For debugging it would help if there was a way to force a flush of the
> entire cache, and one to dump its contents. I'm not sure how you'd get
> saslauthd to recognise maintenance commands like this - maybe some method
> of "out-of-band signalling", which seems better than tinkering with the
> socket protocol.
>
> --
> Simon Brady mailto:
> ITS Technical Services
> University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
How about SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2?
Cheers,
Jeremy
|
|
|