From: Amos Gouaux (+)
Date: Fri Nov 09 2001 - 01:15:07 EST
>>>>> On 08 Nov 2001 18:22:35 +0000,
>>>>> Ian Castle <> (ic) writes:
ic> 8. Summary
ic> I think this is a good solution because:
ic> - No new concepts are introduced, it is rather a clarification of
ic> existing ones
ic> - Backwards compatibility is preserved
ic> - You get some nice cool features - sieving on public folders, having
ic> different scripts for different folders - including your own sub
ic> folders, different people can maintain different folders
ic> - Shouldn't have any particular performance implications.
What about all the stats looking for the script? Could that be a
problem? If so, could a db be used as a Sieve script index, like
the mailboxes.db?
-- Amos
|
|
|